advanced search
Teacher Resources Interactive Catalog Find A Store

Shopping Cart  0 Item(s) in cart

Subtotal: $0.00





 
 

Educational Articles

No Child Left Behind
What it all means -- Part 2

By Marion Hindes
for Remedia Publications


In our previous article we discussed the major provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act. Now let us turn our attention to its implications for special education.

First, we will summarize what the law states regarding testing as it applies to students with special needs. Then we will briefly discuss the efforts of the Educational Policy Reform Research Institute to examine the challenges of including students with disabilities in the new accountability system.

Federal laws, primarily the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), require that students with disabilities be included in state and district-wide assessments. Congress required this because it found that many students, especially those with disabilities, with limited English proficiency (LEP), as well as poor, migrant, minority, and homeless students, were not performing well enough in school to become successful adults. They found that many educational programs offered lower quality curriculum and expected too little of their students. The anticipated benefit of the law is that inclusion in assessments will promote access to the general curriculum. As a result, students with special needs will be afforded a more equal opportunity to learn what their fellow students are learning, because they will have to be tested in the same content areas. (These tests primarily focus on the areas of Math, Reading, and Language Arts).

IDEA states that the IEP team (which always includes a parent or parent representative) will determine how, not whether, a student participates in assessments. The IEP team has the authority - with accountability-to devise either:

•  An accommodation or modification to the test. These terms are often used interchangeably, but we will differentiate between them here. An accommodation is the lesser change of the two. It may involve such externals as changing the timing, setting, scheduling, format of the test, or the way a student can respond to the questions. It does not significantly alter the scoring results or what the test measures. A modification is a different matter. It is any change that alters scoring results or what the test measures (i.e. a test that is below grade level or that covers entirely different content). The IEP team is required to bear in mind how an accommodation or modification might affect the validity of the test scores, and therefore the chances a student has to be promoted or to graduate.

•  OR: an alternate assessment. Again, this assessment would need to conform as much as possible to the general education standards set for all students. Alternate assessments should test the same content areas as those tested in the rest of the student population. They may also test additional areas, such as functional skills.

Parents may decide to have their disabled child “opt out” of an assessment, only if their state allows parents of non-disabled students to “opt out.”   However, parents and students need to be aware that “opting out” may hinder promotion to the next grade, or even the ability to graduate.

The Educational Policy Reform Research Institute (EPRRI) is researching what is actually involved with fully including students with disabilities in the new accountability measures. It is a federally funded consortium of three organizations: the Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, the National Center on Educational Outcomes, and the Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative at Education Development Center, Inc. The EPRRI seeks to determine:

 

•     How educational accountability reforms and measures (i.e. tests) impact
               students with disabilities

•     How special education has been held accountable in the past

•     How the needs of students with disabilities are factored into high-stakes accountability

•     How special education can be better aligned with accountability reform.

 

It is evident that, however controversial, standards and testing are a very present reality for today’s teacher. For a more in-depth look at assessment issues, you may find these information sources to be helpful: www.ed.gov and www.eprri.org.

 

At Remedia, we strive to support you in your efforts to meet the challenges of testing and standards-based education. To that end, we invite you to visit our web site at www.remediapublications.com for a description of our skills-based materials (including test preparation) and the performance objectives they meet.


Information Sources: (See web site addresses above).

Office of Special Education: Guidance on Including Students with Disabilities in Assessment Programs.

Office of Special Education: Questions and Answers about Provisions in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 Related to Students with Disabilities and State and District-wide Assessments.

The Educational Policy Reform Research Institute.

-- Marion Hindes