|
Educational Articles
No Child Left Behind
What it all means -- Part 2
By Marion Hindes
for Remedia Publications
In our previous article we
discussed the major provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act. Now let
us turn our attention to its implications for special education.
First, we will summarize what the law states regarding testing as it
applies to students with special needs. Then we will briefly discuss the
efforts of the Educational Policy Reform Research Institute to examine
the challenges of including students with disabilities in the new
accountability system.
Federal laws, primarily the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Title 1 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), require that students
with disabilities be included in state and district-wide assessments.
Congress required this because it found that many students, especially
those with disabilities, with limited English proficiency (LEP), as well
as poor, migrant, minority, and homeless students, were not performing
well enough in school to become successful adults. They found that many
educational programs offered lower quality curriculum and expected too
little of their students. The anticipated benefit of the law is that
inclusion in assessments will promote access to the general curriculum.
As a result, students with special needs will be afforded a more equal
opportunity to learn what their fellow students are learning, because
they will have to be tested in the same content areas. (These tests
primarily focus on the areas of Math, Reading, and Language Arts).
IDEA states that the IEP team
(which always includes a parent or parent representative) will determine
how, not whether, a student participates in assessments. The IEP
team has the authority - with accountability-to devise either:
• An accommodation
or modification to the test. These terms are often used
interchangeably, but we will differentiate between them here. An accommodation
is the lesser change of the two. It may involve such externals as
changing the timing, setting, scheduling, format of the test, or the
way a student can respond to the questions. It does not significantly
alter the scoring results or what the test measures. A modification
is a different matter. It is any change that alters scoring
results or what the test measures (i.e. a test that is below grade
level or that covers entirely different content). The IEP team is
required to bear in mind how an accommodation or modification might
affect the validity of the test scores, and therefore the chances a
student has to be promoted or to graduate.
• OR: an alternate
assessment. Again, this assessment would need to conform as much
as possible to the general education standards set for all students.
Alternate assessments should test the same content areas as those
tested in the rest of the student population. They may also test
additional areas, such as functional skills.
Parents may decide to have
their disabled child “opt out” of an assessment, only if
their state allows parents of non-disabled students to “opt
out.” However, parents and students need to be aware
that “opting out” may hinder promotion to the next grade, or even
the ability to graduate.
The Educational Policy Reform
Research Institute (EPRRI) is researching what is actually involved with
fully including students with disabilities in the new accountability
measures. It is a federally funded consortium of three organizations:
the Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, the
National Center on Educational Outcomes, and the Urban Special Education
Leadership Collaborative at Education Development Center, Inc. The EPRRI
seeks to determine:
• How educational accountability
reforms and measures (i.e. tests) impact
students
with disabilities
• How special education has been
held accountable in the past
• How the needs of students with
disabilities are factored into high-stakes accountability
• How special education can be
better aligned with accountability reform.
It is evident that, however
controversial, standards and testing are a very present reality for today’s
teacher. For a more in-depth look at assessment issues, you may find
these information sources to be helpful: www.ed.gov and www.eprri.org.
At Remedia, we strive to support
you in your efforts to meet the challenges of testing and
standards-based education. To that end, we invite you to visit our web
site at www.remediapublications.com
for a description of our skills-based materials (including test
preparation) and the performance objectives they meet.
Information Sources: (See web site addresses above).
Office of Special Education:
Guidance on Including Students with Disabilities in Assessment Programs.
Office of Special Education:
Questions and Answers about Provisions in the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997
Related to Students with Disabilities and State and District-wide Assessments.
The Educational Policy Reform
Research Institute.
-- Marion
Hindes
|